
Clarifying user intent
The user's message may be a request for a news article, explanation, or discussion. I think it’s best to ask a clarifying question to understand what they want — context, translation, article, or opinion? It's necessary since I'm unsure. I could give a quick explanation about a likely quip regarding unrealistic fan demands, but I must avoid fabricating specifics due to my knowledge cutoff. Asking for context or source is the better approach here.Proposing options clearly
I think it's perfectly fine to suggest options as the guidelines recommend using numeric lists when offering multiple choices. I can ask the user to pick from the suggested options, keeping it straightforward and minimal. It’s essential to ensure my response is clear and easy to navigate. This way, the user can easily understand their choices without any extra clutter in the response. I’m ready to provide a concise list for them!

你是在吐槽还是要我解读/改写这段话?
快速解读:
- 斯帕莱蒂这是在反讽“让某位叫‘戴维’的球员连续首发五场”的要求不现实。
- 他用“难道我也得带皇马、巴萨各五场?”打比方:别人提的不切实际标准,我也可以提同样不现实的对等要求。
- 核心意思:用人要看状态、对手和负荷管理,不会按媒体/球迷的“连上五场”来排兵布阵。
需要我做什么?
- 指明“戴维”具体是谁(弗拉泰西/卡拉布里亚/扎帕科斯塔等)并补全上下文
- 写成新闻快讯/赛后发布会要点
- 做成社媒文案(犀利版/客观版)
- 做战术/轮换的专业解读

你想要哪个?
